Embracing Autonomy: Are Students of Autonomous Colleges Satisfied?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n12.021

Keywords:

Autonomy, Student Satisfaction, Autonomous Colleges, Higher Education, Odisha

Abstract

In higher education, autonomy is commonly seen as a way to improve academic quality and stakeholder satisfaction, especially student satisfaction. The current study looks at students' satisfaction levels in Odisha's autonomous colleges. Data were gathered from 400 students chosen by proportionate stratified random sampling from 14 autonomous colleges using a descriptive survey design. Data was gathered using a 40-item, self-developed Students' Satisfaction Scale. With a Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.979, the instrument showed excellent reliability. To interpret the data, percentage analysis was used. According to the results, students are moderately to highly satisfied with faculty members in terms of their ability to teach effectively, their readiness, their communication skills, and their approachability. However, there are conflicting results regarding how satisfied students are with the facilities and support provided by the institution. Placement services, research opportunities, co-curricular activities, laboratory infrastructure, and internet facilities are reported to cause significant dissatisfaction, despite the positive perceptions of academic resources, practical exposure, seminars, and policy transparency. The study comes to the conclusion that, despite autonomy's beneficial effects on academic processes, its full potential is still underutilised because of infrastructure and support-related constraints. To increase student satisfaction in autonomous colleges, institutional facilities and career-oriented support services must be strengthened.

Author Biographies

Akankshya Pramanik, Ph.D. Scholar, Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha

Akankshya Pramanik, Ph.D. scholar, pursuing Ph.D. from the P.G. Department of Education, Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha. She completed her M.A. in Education as a rank holder from Ramadevi Women's University, Odisha. Her research interest focuses on Educational Management and Educational Technology.

Prof. Jyoti Sankar Pradhan, Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha

Prof. (Dr.) Jyoti Sankar Pradhan is a Professor at Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, Odisha. His research focuses on Elementary Education, Higher Education, Educational Technology, and Teacher Education.

Prof. Gouranga Charan Nanda, Ramadevi Women's University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

Prof. Gouranga Charan Nanda is a Retd. Professor of Education at Ramadevi Women's University, Bhubaneswar. His research focuses on Educational Philosophy, Educational Research, Teacher Education, Curriculum Development, and Elementary Education.

References

Audi, R. (1991). Autonomy, reason, and desire. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72(4), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1991.tb00320.x

Bajaj, K. (1989). University autonomous college interaction. University News, 27(31), 6–7.

Gemes, K., & May, S. (2009). Nietzsche on freedom and autonomy. OUP Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231560.001.0001

Financial Express. (2020, August). NEP 2020: Universities not to affiliate over 300 colleges, says Ramesh Pokhriyal. https://www.financialexpress.com/education-2/nep2020-universities-not-to-affiliate-over-300-colleges-says-ramesh-pokhriyal/2053402/

India Today. (2020, August 15). NEP 2020: New education policy to revamp the education system of 21st century. https://www.indiatoday.in/educationtoday/featurephilia/story/nep-2020-new-education-policy-to-revamp-the-education-system-of-21st-century-1711501-2020-08-15

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentic.

Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. New Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India.

Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). (2019). AISHE final report 2018–19. New Delhi: Government of India.

Sarup, A. (1988). University autonomy and accountability. Journal of Higher Education, 16(2), 163–171. http://dspace.hmlibrary.ac.in:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1849/10/10_Chapter%204.pdf

Sharma, A., & Singh, H. (2018). Autonomy in higher education. GE-International Journal of Management Research, 6(10), 1–8.

Sugarman, S. (1990). Piaget's construction of the child's reality. Cambridge University Press.

The India Forum. (2020, September 4). NEP 2020 on higher education. https://www.theindiaforum.in/article/nep-2020-higher-education

The New Indian Express. (2020, August 9). Education policy: The exit of affiliation. https://www.newindianexpress.com/opinions/2020/aug/09/education-policy-the-exit-of-affiliation-2180944.html

University Grants Commission (UGC). (2018). Revised guidelines on the scheme of autonomous colleges. New Delhi: University Grants Commission.

UNESCO. (2002). External quality assurance in Indian higher education: Case study of the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning. https://www.unesco.org/iiep

CNBC TV18. (2020, August). NEP 2020: Upgrading Indian universities to global standards. https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/nep-2020-upgrading-indian-universities-to-global-standards-6670131.htm

Downloads

Published

15-12-2025

How to Cite

Pramanik, A., Pradhan, J. S., & Nanda, G. C. (2025). Embracing Autonomy: Are Students of Autonomous Colleges Satisfied?. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(12), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n12.021