Inner Ghosts: Psychological Gothic in Ruskin Bond Compared with British Gothic Subjectivity

Authors

  • Reshmi Khatun SACT-1, Dept. of English, Chandidas Mahavidyalaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n12.027

Keywords:

Psychological Gothic, Ruskin Bond, British Gothic, Subjectivity, Inner Ghosts, Comparative Literature

Abstract

This article examines the idea of psychological Gothic by comparing the works of Ruskin Bond with the canon of British Gothic subjectivity. Finding the Gothic within the human mind, the study goes beyond traditional Gothic themes like haunted castles and otherworldly terror to demonstrate that both traditions internalize fear. Writings of British Gothic authors like Edgar Allan Poe, Robert Louis Stevenson, and Daphne du Maurier portray worries brought about by modernity, morality, and societal restraint through subjectivity characterized by divided selves, repression, guilt, and obsession. Memory, isolation, childhood trauma, and the eerie presence of nature created Ruskin Bond’s darker, more introspective Gothic sensibility. Rather than terrifying monsters, his “ghosts” often take the form of unsettling thoughts, feelings, and unresolved psychological issues. This thesis compares and contrasts the two genres to show how Bond indigenousizes the Gothic style, turning it into an introspective examination of inner life instead of exterior horror. Various cultural settings manage dread, alienation, and selfhood differently, but psychological gothic becomes a shared aesthetic realm, as the study highlights. In the end, the study contends that Ruskin Bond’s writings take Gothic subjectivity to new heights by establishing its foundation in emotional reality, quiet, and mental interiors.

References

Always felt ghosts not out to scare, harm us: Ruskin Bond. (2019). The Tribune.

Ann Radcliffe’s The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794). Retrieved from Wikipedia.

Asha, S. (2021). A moving spectrum of life: Ruskin Bond’s ghost stories. Journal of Teaching and Research in English Literature.

Bond, R. (2019, January 17). Always felt ghosts not out to scare or harm us. Business Standard (PTI).

Bond, R. (n.d.). You don’t have to believe in ghosts… (as cited in Is Ruskin Bond’s most intriguing work his ghost stories?). Scroll.in.

Chatterjee, A. K. (2021). Ruskin Bond’s haunted architecture: Anglo-Saxon archetypes of the Doon Valley. Anglo Saxonica, 19(1),

Derrida, J. (1993). Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. (Concept of hauntology).

Hayles Gledhill, E. (2019). Deviant subjectivities: Monstrosity and kinship in the Gothic imagination (Ph.D. thesis). University of Reading.

Hogle, J. E. (n.d.). The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction (selected quotes on psychological theatre).

Is Ruskin Bond’s most intriguing work his ghost stories? (2025). Scroll.in.

Radcliffe, A. (1826). On the Supernatural in Poetry (pp. 145–152). The New Monthly Magazine.

The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794). In Wikipedia.

Varma, D. P. (1966). The Gothic Flame: Being a History of the Gothic Novel in England (pp. 22–24).

Downloads

Published

15-12-2025

How to Cite

Khatun, R. (2025). Inner Ghosts: Psychological Gothic in Ruskin Bond Compared with British Gothic Subjectivity. RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 10(12), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2025.v10.n12.027